The goal of officiating at swim meets is to ensure a fair competition for all swimmers. Officiating also provides consistent and accurate feedback to swimmers based on the technical rules of swimming. It’s up to the officials to maintain the integrity of those rules.
We’ll start with our philosophy of officiating to build your foundation of what role officials play in swimming.
The philosophy of officiating supports the goal - to ensure a fair competition for all swimmers.
Keep our four standards of this philosophy in mind as you continue to build your foundations of officiating:
Everything is grounded in the rules
Officials are not coaches
Be a consistent observer
The swimmer ALWAYS gets the benefit of the doubt
Before you learn the specifics of what Officials do, you need to understand the overarching
philosophy.
It always goes back to the goal of officiating - to ensure a fair competition for all swimmers. Built
within this goal are the following standards:
Everything is grounded in the rules
Officials are not coaches
Be a consistent observer
The swimmer ALWAYS gets the benefit of the doubt
Everything is grounded in the rules. The rules determine what is allowed and what is not. The
rules are the basis of all that officials do. It is your responsibility to ensure that all swimmers are
competing within the rules. You will study the rules of swimming and learn how to apply those
rules in a meet setting.
There will be numerous cases, particularly with younger children, where a swimmer’s stroke
may appear very “ugly” but falls within the rules. If the swimmer is swimming legally, the
swimmer is swimming legally. The rules allow for a variety of legal variations of the strokes. And
there are a number of possibilities for how they are performed. It is the role of officials to utilize
their judgment to determine whether or not a swimmer is competing within the rules of the
stroke.
Officials are not coaches, and therefore should not be providing any instruction to swimmers.
Officials observe the swimmers and report infractions. Coaches help the swimmers develop to
prevent infractions in future swims.
Be a consistent observer. Officials are observers, not inspectors. It is your role to observe the
swimmers in your jurisdiction, and report any infraction if you observe something outside of the
rules. You should NOT be inspecting, scrutinizing, or criticizing the swimmers’ strokes.
Judge all lanes in the jurisdiction using an equal amount of observation time. For example,
when judging four lanes, you will spend 25% of the observation time on each lane. Even when
there are no swimmers in a lane during a particular swim, you should still spend 25% of your
time on that empty lane.
Observation should be consistent for all rules and all swimmers. The swim of a six year old
should be observed in the same way as that of a sixteen year old. Swim meets are a learning
experience, and, if a swimmer is disqualified, they will eventually learn to perform the stroke
legally. No swimmer should be held to a lower or higher standard because of their age.
You are not doing the swimmer a favor by ignoring a stroke infraction. If it’s not called, the
swimmer doesn't learn. And it goes without saying that a swimmer’s team or your relationship
to them should not play any role in your observation - even if it’s your own child!
All rules should be considered in observation, none more than others. There is no one rule that
is more or less important than any of the others. All rules are thoroughly vetted nationally and
internationally. In no case should your opinion or individual interpretation of a rule play any role
in your observation. You can’t decide that a specific violation doesn’t offer the swimmer a
“competitive advantage” and not call the infraction.
Do not infer or extrapolate. Officials must specifically, personally, observe an infraction in order
to report it. For example, in order to call a one-hand touch in the butterfly or breaststroke, the
official must observe one hand NOT touching (as opposed to simply observing only one hand
touch). You can only call what you see, not what you don’t see.
Don’t read more into the rules than is written. Remember…everything is grounded in the rules.
The rules are the basis of all that officials do. It is your responsibility to ensure that all swimmers
are competing within the rules, as written. There are also checks and balances to officiating. The
Stroke and Turn Judge notes an infraction, a Chief Judge or Referee solidifies the call with
questions, and the Referee makes a final decision whether to uphold the call.
Beware of “over officiating.” If you are spending too much time looking at one swimmer,
because something caught your eye, move on. If you want to make a call because of a “feeling,”
don’t. You must keep your observation equal and consistent. And if you cannot describe what
you observed, don’t make the call.
This leads to our golden rule: the swimmer ALWAYS gets the benefit of the doubt. If there is
ANY doubt or uncertainty as to whether or not an infraction was committed by a swimmer, do
not make a call. As an official, you may withdraw a call at ANY time - even once accepted by a
referee - if you later doubt what you observed.
Remember the goal of officiating - to ensure a fair competition for all swimmers. Be sure to give
them your best effort
Do you think you will feel uncomfortable calling an infraction on a very young swimmer? Can you be impartial when you officiate your own child’s club at meets? Take a moment to reflect on this.
The goal of officiating is fair competition. As an Official, you need to observe in a fair, consistent, and impartial manner. Use common sense to apply the rules and judge accordingly.
Fair competition sometimes requires swimmers to be disqualified. In this way, Officials provide opportunities for athletes to learn and grow in their quest to develop as a swimmer. Remember the golden rule: the swimmer ALWAYS gets the benefit of the doubt.
You’ve finished Module 2: Philosophy of Officiating. Now it’s time to move to Module 3: Expectations and Professional Conduct.
Click Next to start Module 3: Expectations and Professional Conduct